ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID ANTIBODIES AND VASCULAR THROMBOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH THE MOST SEVERE FORMS OF COVID-19

BackgroundThe presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) has been observed in patients with COVID-19 (1,2), suggesting that they may be associated with deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or stroke in severe cases (3). Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder and the most common form of acquired thrombophilia globally. At least one clinical criterion, vascular thrombosis (arterial, venous or microthrombosis) or pregnancy morbidity and at least one laboratory criterion- positive aPL two times at least 12 weeks apart: lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL), anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 (anti-β2GPI) antibody, have to be met for international APS classification criteria(4). Several reports also associate anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) with APS.ObjectivesTo combine clinical data on arterial/venous thrombosis and pregnancy complications before and during hospitalisation with aPL laboratory findings at 4 time points (hospital admission, worsening of COVID-19, hospital discharge, and follow-up) in patients with the most severe forms of COVID-19 infection.MethodsPatients with COVID-19 pneumonia were consequetively enrolled, as they were admitted to the General hospital Pancevo. Exclusion criteria were previous diagnosis of inflammatory rheumatic disease and diagnosis of APS. Clinical data were obtained from the medical records. Laboratory results, including LA, aCL, anti-β2GPI, and aPS/PT antibodies were taken at hospital admission, worsening (defined as cytokine storm, connection of the patient to the respirator, use of the anti-IL-6 drug- Tocilizumab), at hospital discharge and at 3-months follow-up and sent to University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia for analysis. Statistics was performed by using SPSS 21.Results111 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were recruited;7 patients died during hospitalisation (none were aPL-positive on admission and at the time of worsening), 3 due to pulmonary artery embolism. All patients were treated according to a predefined protocol which included antibiotics, corticosteroids, anticoagulation therapy and specific comorbidity drugs;patients with hypoxia were supported with oxygen. During hospitalisation, pulmonary artery thrombosis occurred in 5 patients, one was aPL-positive at all time points (was diagnosed with APS), others were negative. In addition, 9/101 patients had a history of thrombosis (5 arterial thrombosis (coronary and cerebral arteries), none of whom was aPL-positive on admission and at follow-up, and 4 venous thrombosis, one of which was aPL-positive at all time points and received an APS diagnosis). Among 9/101 patients with a history of thrombosis, 55.6% were transiently positive at the time of discharge, compared to patients without prior thrombosis, in whom 26.1% were transiently positive at the hospital release (p=0.074). Two patients had a history of pregnancy complications (both had miscarriage after 10th week of gestation), but did not have aPL positivity at any time point.ConclusionAlthough aPL was expected to be associated with vascular disease in the most severe forms of COVID-19, all patients that have died in our cohort were aPL negative. At hospital discharge, 56% of patients with a history of arterial or venous thrombosis had positive aPL that became negative at the 3-months follow-up (were transienlty positive), which should be considered when prescribing therapy after hospitalisation.References[1]Trahtemberg U, Rottapel R, Dos Santos CC, et al. Anticardiolipin and other antiphospholipid antibodies in critically ill COVID-19 positive and negative patients. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2021;80:1236-1240.[2]Stelzer M, Henes J, Saur S. The Role of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in COVID-19. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2021;23(9):72-4.[3]Xie Y, Wang X, Yang P, Zhang S. COVID-19 complicated by acute pulmonary embolism. Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging 2020: 2: e200067.[4]Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, Branch DW, Brey RL, et al. J.Thromb.Haemost. 2006;4: 295-306.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of nterestsNone Declared.

Sometimes Late Is Better Than Never: Implantation of a Cardioverter Defibrillator Years after an Acute Myocardial Infarction - Case Report

Sustained ventricular arrhythmias that occur early post-myocardial infarction (MI) are generally considered epiphenomena of the MI and are not consistently associated with long-term prognosis. The lack of association with long-term prognosis is more clearly established for early ventricular fibrillation (VF) and polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PVT). Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT), even when it occurs early, however, may reflect a permanent arrhythmic substrate1. Patients with COVID-19 have a high risk of thromboembolic events, and the virus has also been shown to have extensive effects on the cardiovascular system2,3,4. A 62-year-old woman, recently hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia, was brought to the emergency department with pulseless SMVT having been successfully resuscitated in the prehospital setting. The patient has a history of an old MI treated with thrombolysis and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) that was complicated with early SMVT, but with preserved left ventricular function and without heart failure. The patient underwent implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). During the hospitalization, she developed dyspnea and was diagnosed with minor pulmonary embolism. It may be appropriate to consider early SMVT as a predictor of adverse late outcomes that would necessitate rigorous follow-up and maybe an early invasive primary prevention strategy. This case also reflects the possibility of long-term cardiac involvement and increased thromboembolic risk in patients recovering from COVID-19. © 2022 Maria Zamfirescu et al., published by Sciendo.

Acute or chronic? Failing left ventricle in a 34 year old

Submission content Introduction: An unusual case of a very young patient without previously known cardiac disease presenting with severe left ventricular failure, detected by a point of care echocardiogram. Main Body: A 34 year old previously well man was brought to hospital after seeing his general practitioner with one month of progressive shortness of breath on exertion. This began around the time the patient received his second covid-19 vaccination. He was sleeping in a chair as he was unable to lie flat. Abnormal observations led the GP to call an ambulance. In the emergency department, the patient required oxygen 5L/min to maintain SpO2 >94%, but he was not in respiratory distress at rest. Blood pressure was 92/53mmHg, mean 67mmHg. Point of care testing for COVID-19 was negative. He was alert, with warm peripheries. Lactate was 1.0mmol/L and he was producing more than 0.5ml/kg/hr of urine. There was no ankle swelling. ECG showed sinus tachycardia. He underwent CT pulmonary angiography which demonstrated no pulmonary embolus, but there was bilateral pulmonary edema. Troponin was 17ng/l, BNP was 2700pg/ml. Furosemide 40mg was given intravenously by the general medical team. Critical care outreach asked for an urgent intensivist review given the highly unusual diagnosis of pulmonary edema in a man of this age. An immediate FUSIC Heart scan identified a dilated left ventricle with end diastolic diameter 7cm and severe global systolic impairment. The right ventricle was not severely impaired, with TAPSE 18mm. There was no significant pericardial effusion. Multiple B lines and trace pulmonary effusions were identified at the lung bases. The patient was urgently discussed with the regional cardiac unit in case of further deterioration, basic images were shared via a cloud system. A potential diagnosis of vaccination-associated myocarditis was considered,1 but in view of the low troponin, the presentation was felt most likely to represent decompensated chronic dilated cardiomyopathy. The patient disclosed a family history of early cardiac death in males. Aggressive diuresis was commenced. The patient was admitted to a monitored bed given the potential risk of arrhythmia or further haemodynamic deterioration. Advice was given that in the event of worsening hypotension, fluids should not be administered but the cardiac centre should be contacted immediately. Formal echocardiography confirmed the POCUS findings, with ejection fraction <35%. He was initiated on ACE inhibitors and beta adrenergic blockade. His symptoms improved and he was able to return home and to work, and is currently undergoing further investigations to establish the etiology of his condition. Conclusion(s): Early echocardiography provided early evidence of a cardiac cause for the patient's presentation and highlighted the severity of the underlying pathology. This directed early aggressive diuresis and safety-netting by virtue of discussion with a tertiary cardiac centre whilst it was established whether this was an acute or decompensated chronic pathology. Ultrasound findings: PLAX, PSAX and A4Ch views demonstrating a severely dilated (7cm end diastolic diameter) left ventricle with global severe systolic impairment.

Refractory circulatory failure in COVID-19 patients treated with veno-arterial ECMO: A retrospective single-center experience

Objectives: Data about COVID-19 patients treated with veno-arterial-ECMO (VA-ECMO) is limited. Reported survival rates range from 27.9% to 77.8%, depending on VA-ECMO indication. A subgroup of patients suffers from circulatory failure due to a COVID-19 associated hyperinflammatory state (CovHI). In these patients, differentiation between inflammation and sepsis is difficult but important. In this retrospective case series, differential diagnoses of COVID-19 associated refractory circulatory failure and survival rates in different indications for VA-ECMO are investigated. Method(s): Retrospective analysis of 28 consecutive COVID-19 patients requiring VA-ECMO at the University Hospital Regensburg between March 2020 and May 2022. Specific treatment for COVID-19 was in accordance with respective guidelines. Mycotic infections were either invasive or met current definitions of COVID19-associated-pulmonary aspergillosis. Result(s): At VA-ECMO initiation, median age was 57.3 years (IQR: 51.4 - 61.8), SOFA score 16 (IQR: 13 - 17) and norepinephrine dosing 0.53mug/kg/min (IQR: 0.32 - 0.78). Virus-variants were: 61% wild-type, 14% Alpha, 18% Delta and 7% Omicron. Survival to hospital discharge was 39%. 17 patients were primarily supported with VA-ECMO only (survival 42%), 3 patients were switched from VV to VA-ECMO (survival 0%), and 8 patients were converted from VA to VAV or VV-ECMO (survival 50%). Indications for VA-ECMO support were pulmonary embolism (PE) (n=5, survival 80%), right heart failure due to secondary pulmonary hypertension (n=5, survival 20%), cardiac arrest (n=4, survival 25%), acute left heart failure (ALHF) (n=11, survival 36%) and refractory vasoplegia (n=3, survival 0%). Inflammatory markers at VA-ECMO initiation were higher in patients with ALHF or vasoplegia;in these patients a higher rate of invasive fungal infections (10/14, 71% vs. 4/14, 29%;p=0.023) compared to the other patients was found. Conclusion(s): Survival on VA-ECMO in COVID-19 depends on VA-ECMO indication, which should be considered in further studies and clinical decisions making. Circulatory failure due to vasoplegia should be considered very carefully as indication for VA-ECMO. A high rate of mycotic infections mandates an intense microbiological workup of these patients and must be considered as an important differential diagnosis to CovHI.

Long-term support of COVID-19 patients with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Complications, predictors of mortality and long-term outcome

Objectives: Treatment of severe respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 by veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) had a mortality of up to 70% in Germany. Many patients with COVID-19 need VV-ECMO support longer than 28 days (long-term VV-ECMO). Evidence on mortality, complications during intensive care, functional status after discharge and mortality-predictors for patients supported with long-term VV-ECMO is lacking. Method(s): Retrospective study of 137 consecutive patients treated with VV-ECMO for ARDS due to COVID-19 at University Hospital Regensburg from March 2020 to March 2022. Result(s): 38% (n=52;87% male) of patients needed longterm VV-ECMO support. In these, SOFA score (median [IQR]) at ECMO initiation was 9 [8-11], age 58.2 [50.6- 62.5] years, PaO2/FiO2-ratio 67 [52-88] mmHg, pCO262 [52-74] mmHg, Murray-Score 3.3 [3.0-3.6] and PEEP 15 [13 - 16] cmH2O. Duration of long-term support was 45 [35-65] days. 26 (50%) patients were discharged from the ICU. Only one patient died after hospital discharge. At VVECMO initiation, baseline characteristics did not differ between deceased and survivors. Complications were frequent (acute kidney injury: 31/52, renal replacement therapy: 14/52, pulmonary embolism: 21/52, intracranial hemorrhage 8/52, major bleeding 34/52 and secondary sclerosing cholangitis: 5/52) and more frequent in the deceased. Karnofsky index (normal 100) after rehabilitation was 70 [57.5-82.5]. Twelve of the 18 patients discharged from rehabilitation had a satisfactory quality of life according to their own subjective assessment. Four patients required nursing support. Mortality-predictors within the first 30 days on VV-ECMO only observed in those who deceased later, were: Bilirubin >5mg/dl for > 7 days, pulmonary compliance <10ml/mbar for >14 days, and repeated serum concentrations of interleukin 8 >150ng/L. Conclusion(s): Long-term extracorporeal lung support in patients with COVID-19 resulted in 50 % survival and subsequently lead to a satisfactory quality of life and functionality in the majority of patients. It should preferably be performed in experienced centers because of a high incidence of complications. Several findings during the early course were associated with late mortality but need validation in large prospective studies.

Pathophysiology of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19

Introduction and aim. A small number of critically ill patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) develop thromboembolism (arterial or venous), both micro- and macrovascular complications such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and pulmonary arterial thrombosis. The objective of the study is to describe the pathophysiology of venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19. Material and methods. In this article a narrative review regarding pathophysiology of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19. Analysis of the literature. The development of coagulopathy is a consequence of the intense inflammatory response associated with hypercoagulability, platelet activation, and endothelial dysfunction. The pathophysiology that relates pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) with COVID-19 is associated with a hypercoagulable state. PTE is suspected in hospitalized patients presenting dyspnea, decreased oxygen requirement, hemodynamic instability, and dissociation between hemodynamic and respiratory changes. In COVID-19-associated coagulopathy, initially, patients present with elevated levels of fibrinogen and D-dimer, with minimal changes in prothrombin time and platelet count. The main risk factor for the development of pulmonary embolism is the increase in D-dimer that is associated with the development of PTE. The administration of iodine-based contrast agent to patients with COVID-19 would affect P-creatinine and renal function, where Ultrasound is viewed as cost-effective and highly portable, can be performed at the bedside. Conclusion. Acute respiratory distress syndrome severity in patients with COVID-19 can explain PTE as a consequence of an exaggerated immune response. © 2022 Publishing Office of the University of Rzeszow. All Rights Reserved.

SAFETY OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS (PTS) WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (RA) TREATED WITH FILGOTINIB (FIL) IN FILOSOPHY: INTERIM RESULTS FROM A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

BackgroundConsideration is needed when using Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors to treat RA in pts aged ≥65 years or those with cardiovascular (CV) risk factors. The JAK1 preferential inhibitor FIL was generally well tolerated in clinical trials[1];safety has not been determined in a real-world setting.ObjectivesTo report baseline characteristics and up to 6-month safety data from the first 480 pts treated with FIL in the FILOSOPHY study (NCT04871919), and in two mutually exclusive subgroups based on age and CV risk.MethodsFILOSOPHY is an ongoing, phase 4, non-interventional, European study of pts with RA who have been prescribed FIL for the first time and in accordance with the product label in daily practice. Baseline characteristics and the incidence of select adverse events (AEs) are assessed in pts aged ≥65 years and/or with ≥1 CV risk factor (Table 1), and in those aged <65 years with no CV risk factors.ResultsAs of the end of June 2022, 480 pts had been treated: 441 received FIL 200 mg and 39 received FIL 100 mg. Of the 480 pts, 148 (30.8%) were aged ≥65 years;332 (69.2%) were aged <65 years. In total, 86 (17.9%) were former smokers, 81 (16.9%) were current smokers and 203 (42.3%) were non-smokers (data were missing for 110 pts [22.9%]). In addition to smoking, the most frequent CV risk factors included a history of hypertension (32.3%), a history of dyslipidemia (10.2%) and a family history of myocardial infarction (8.5%;Table 1).23 pts (4.8%) discontinued treatment due to AEs. Of the 354 pts aged ≥65 years or with ≥1 CV risk factor, infections affected 64 pts (18.1%), 34 (9.6%) had COVID-19, 2 (0.6%) had herpes zoster, and cardiac disorders (angina pectoris, atrial fibrillation, palpitations and tachycardia) affected 5 pts (1.4%);no cases of malignancies were observed. In the subgroup aged <65 years and with no CV risk factors (n=126), infections occurred in 18 pts (14.3%) (9 [7.1%] had COVID-19;3 [2.4%] had herpes zoster) and malignancies (myeloproliferative neoplasm) affected 1 pt (0.8%);no pts had cardiac disorders. There were no cases of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism in either subgroup.ConclusionIn this interim analysis of FILOSOPHY, no unexpected safety signals emerged at up to 6 months. Although infections and cardiac disorders affected a numerically greater proportion of pts aged ≥65 years or with ≥1 CV risk vs those aged <65 years with no CV risk, longer follow-up on a broader cohort is necessary to further characterize the safety of FIL in different groups of pts with RA.Reference[1]Winthrop K, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2022;81:184–92Table 1.Baseline characteristics and CV risk factorsBaseline demographics/CV risk factorsAll FIL-treated pts (N=480)≥65 years or with ≥1 CV risk factor (n=354)<65 years and no CV risk factor (n=126)*Female sex, n (%)351 (73.1)252 (71.2)99 (78.6)Age, years, mean (SD)57.6 (11.5)60.4 (10.8)49.6 (9.6)Rheumatoid factor positive, n (%)†228 (47.5)167 (47.2)61 (48.4)Anti-citrullinated protein antibody positive, n (%)‡243 (50.6)176 (49.7)67 (53. 2)Body mass index, kg/m2, mean (SD)27.6 (5.7) n=43728.0 (5.4) n=33126.3 (6.4) n=106RA disease duration, years, mean (SD)10.4 (9.4) n=47810.5 (9.5) n=35310.0 (8.8) n=125Tender joint count 28, mean (SD)8.6 (6.9) n=4578.7 (7.1) n=3408.3 (6.3) n=117Swollen joint count 28, mean (SD)5.6 (5.2) n=4525.7 (5.4) n=3365.4 (4.4) n=116Former smoker, n (%)§86 (17.9)86 (24.3)0Current smoker, n (%)§81 (16.9)81 (22.9)0Non-smoker, n (%)§203 (42.3)130 (36.7)73 (57.9)Family history of myocardial infarction, n (%)41 (8.5)41 (11.6)0Medical history of: n (%) CV disease33 (6.9)33 (9.3)0 Diabetes35 (7.3)35 (9.9)0 Dyslipidemia49 (10.2)49 (13.8)0 Hypertension155 (32.3)155 (43.8)0 Ischemic CNS  vascular disorders11 (2.3)11 (3.1)0 Peripheral vascular disease17 (3.5)17 (4.8)0*Includes 53 pts with missing smoking status data who were aged <65 years with no other CV risk factors.†Missing/unknown in 154 pts;‡Missing in 153 pts;§Smoking status data missing in 110 pts (22.9%).AcknowledgementsWe thank the physicia s and patients who participated in this study. The study was funded by Galapagos NV, Mechelen, Belgium. Publication coordination was provided by Fabien Debailleul, PhD, of Galapagos NV. Medical writing support was provided by Debbie Sherwood, BSc, CMPP (Aspire Scientific, Bollington, UK), and funded by Galapagos NV.Disclosure of InterestsPatrick Verschueren Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Roularta, Consultant of: Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Nordic Pharma, Sidekick Health, Grant/research support from: Galapagos, Pfizer, Jérôme Avouac Speakers bureau: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: BMS, Fresenius Kabi, Novartis, Pfizer, Karen Bevers Grant/research support from: Galapagos, Susana Romero-Yuste Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Biogen, BMS, Lilly, Pfizer, Consultant of: Sanofi, Lilly, Grant/research support from: Lilly, MSD, Roberto Caporali Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Thomas Debray Consultant of: Biogen, Galapagos, Gilead, Francesco De Leonardis Employee of: Galapagos, James Galloway Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Medicago, Novavax, Pfizer, Monia Zignani Shareholder of: Galapagos, Employee of: Galapagos, Gerd Rüdiger Burmester Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Chugai, Galapagos, Lilly, Pfizer, Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Galapagos, Lilly, Pfizer, Sanofi.

Coagulation Abnormalities in Patients with COVID-19

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging infectious disease. Bilateral pneumonia, acute respiratory failure, systemic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and coagulation activation have been described as key features of severe COVID-19. Fibrinogen and D-dimer are typically increased. Moreover, the risk for venous thromboembolism is markedly increased, especially in patients in the intensive care unit, often despite prophylactic-dose anticoagulation. Pulmonary microvascular thrombosis has also been described and the risk for arterial thrombotic diseases also appears to be increased. Bleeding is less common than thrombosis but can occur. Evaluation for venous thromboembolism may be challenging because symptoms of pulmonary embolism overlap with COVID-19, and imaging studies may not be feasible in all cases. All inpatients should receive thromboprophylaxis unless contraindicated. In hospitalized patients with COVID-19, prophylactic dosing rather than more intensive (intermediate or therapeutic) dosing are suggested. On the other hand, therapeutic dose of anticoagulation is always appropriate to treat deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, unless contraindicated. This article reviews evaluation and management of coagulation abnormalities in individuals with COVID-19. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.

Incidence and Persistence of Post-COVID-19 Conditions in the Year Following Initial Diagnosis

Objectives: Long-COVID, the persistence of various symptoms after COVID-19 infection, is still not fully understood. This study evaluated the incidence and chronicity of post-COVID-19 conditions using administrative claims, which provide a large, generalizable sample, to provide insight into the scope of long-COVID in the United States. Method(s): Patients newly diagnosed with COVID-19 from 4/1/2020-3/31/2021 were identified in the MerativeTM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare databases. The first COVID-19 diagnosis served as the index date and patients were continuously eligible for 12-months pre- and post-index. Incident conditions were defined as a new diagnosis (no pre-period diagnoses) for one of 17 conditions of interest in the first 60-days of the post-period. Among patients with an incident condition, chronicity of the condition was assessed over the remaining post-period (long-term conditions). Result(s): The sample included 503,742 patients;mean+/-SD age was 39.5+/-16.5 and 46% were male. The most common incident conditions were respiratory symptoms (24.1%), fatigue (7.3%), muscle pain (6.0%), and headache (5.9%). Among patients with each of these conditions, long-term persistence was observed in 21.9% for respiratory symptoms, 36.8% for muscle pain, 18.3% for fatigue, and 16.0% for headache. Fewer than 5% patients evidenced incident anxiety, mood disorders, myocarditis, sleep disorders, or pulmonary embolism;however, among these patients, over 40% had long-term persistence of the condition. Among patients with long-term conditions, sleep disorders (248+/-98 days), mood disorders (239+/-96 days), anxiety (236+/-95 days), respiratory symptoms (233+/-92 days), and asthma (230+/-93 days) had the longest average durations of persistence, evidenced by continued claims over the post-period. Conclusion(s): With the continued presence of COVID-19 an understanding of the risk of long-term symptoms is needed to help manage patients both during and following infection. These findings provide some initial insight into the incidence and tenure of various conditions that are affecting patients diagnosed with COVID-19.Copyright © 2023

Navigating the iodinated contrast media shortage: A review

The current COVID-19 climate has caused an unforeseen supply shortage of iodinated contrast media (ICM) worldwide, disrupting global distribution.1 In addition, the scarcity has resulted in a ripple effect in healthcare facilities such as radiology departments where ICM is required to perform contrast-enhanced examinations. ICM plays a significant part in contrast-enhanced CT, angiography and fluoroscopic procedures within the radiology department, holding a primary role in the differentiation and diagnosis of pathologies which range from pulmonary emboli to tumours.1 Its use extends beyond radiology, where ICM is heavily relied on in cardiology, urology and gastrointestinal studies, further highlighting the heavy dependence on the critical agent.2 With the global increase in the number of CT examinations requested, where approximately 60% of studies require ICM, optimal usage of ICM must be considered to meet heightened demand.3 The shortage has represented an opportunity for imaging providers to re-examine current imaging protocols and identify whether non-contrast imaging, alternative contrast agents and other imaging modalities could be viable options moving forward.1,2 Additionally, current literature has discussed volume-reduction strategies and dual-energy use in newer-generation CT scanners to conserve ICM.1,4 This review will explore currently proposed solutions that can be implemented in the radiology department to maximise ICM supply with minimal impact on patient care.

Evaluation of Lung Ultrasound in Assessment of Critically Ill patients in Respiratory Intensive Care Unit

Reaching a proper diagnosis for critically ill patients is like collecting pieces of puzzle and bed side lung ultrasound (LUS) becomes a crucial piece complementary to clinical and laboratory pieces. It is a bed side, real time tool for diagnosis of patients in ICU who are critical to be transferred to radiology unit especially in Covid-19 pandemic with risk of infection transmission. The aim was to evaluate the accuracy of lung ultrasound in assessment of critically ill patients admitted to Respiratory Intensive Care Unit (RICU), moreover to assess its diagnostic performance in different pulmonary diseases as compared to the gold standard approach accordingly. This observational prospective (cross sectional) study with a total 183 patients who met the inclusion criteria,were selected from patients admitted at the RICU;Chest Department, Zagazig University Hospitals, during the period from September 2019 to September 2021. LUS examination was performed to diagnose the different pulmonary diseases causing RF. All cases were examined by LUS on admission. From a total 183 patients, 111 patients 60.7% were males and 72 patients 39.3% were females, with a mean age of 56+/-12.77 years, 130 patients were breathing spontaneously received conservative management with O2 therapy, 32 patients needed NIV while 21 patients needed IMV with ETT. Exacerbated COPD was the most common disease finally diagnosed followed by bacterial pneumonia, exacerbated ILD, post Covid-19 fibrosis and pulmonary embolism in32, 29,27, 19 and 11 patients respectively with corresponding diagnostic accuracy of LUS 97.3%, AUC=0.943, 93.9% (AUC=0.922), 96.7%(AUC=0.920), 97.8%, AUC=0.895, and 97.8% respectively, while Covid-19 pneumonia was the final diagnosis in 8 patients with LUS diagnostic accuracy of 97.8% (AUC=0.869) with no statistical significant difference p-value=0.818 with bacterial pneumonia in distribution of US profiles. A profile was the commonest detected US profile among the studied patients followed by B profile, C profile, A/B profile and A' profile in 37.2%, 24.6%, 15.8% 4.9%, and 3.8% of cases respectively. Bed side LUS has a reliable, valuable diagnostic performance when integrated with clinical and laboratory data for the diagnosis of most pulmonary diseases in RICU.Copyright © 2023, Colegio de Farmaceuticos de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. All rights reserved.

Three Years of COVID-19 Pandemic—Is the Heart Skipping a Beat?

In the context of new therapeutic protocols and vaccines developed in the past 3 years, coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) continues to exert an important impact on the healthcare systems worldwide. Age and a history of cardiovascular or respiratory diseases remain relevant in terms of prognosis for all COVID-19 patients, independent of the viral strain, by conveying a worse outcome and increased rates of in-hospital mortality. Previous studies reported heterogenous cardiovascular manifestations in COVID-19 patients from acute myocarditis or myopericarditis, acute coronary syndromes, stress cardiomyopathy, de novo arrhythmias to pulmonary embolism, or in some rare cases, endocarditis. In this review, we assessed the potential acute, in-hospital and long-term cardiac complications in patients diagnosed with COVID-19. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of COVID is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

СOURSE FEATURES OF A NEW CORONAVIRUS INFECTION IN A COMORBID PATIENT

The appearance of a new coronavirus infection (COVID-19) in 2020 caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus set tasks for doctors of various specialties to quickly diagnose, treat, and develop effective rehabilitation measures. The medical community's knowledge about the respiratory tract lesions pathogenesis course in COVID-19 is going to improve, but the key accents placement in understanding this pathology course continues today. Suspected SARS-CoV-2 virus reference points are as follows: vascular endothelial dysfunction, coagulopathy, thrombosis resembling the antiphospholipid syndrome. Treatment is carried out in accordance with general recommendations aimed at the average patient despite the higher secondary infectious complications risk in patients suffering from cancer and a high severe COVID-19 risk. A successful inpatient treatment experience in patients suffering from comorbid pulmonary pathology and a new coronavirus infection is demonstrated on a separate example. The treatment duration and the complexity of selecting a rehabilitation measures course were due to the patient's history of central squamous cell lung cancer, surgical intervention (bilobectomy), radio- and chemotherapy, as well as complications in the form of pulmonary embolism. The concomitant respiratory pathology was differentiated (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) during examination and treatment and basic therapy was selected, which made the medical rehabilitation stage more effective. The patient's condition required a more careful selection of combined anti-inflammatory, broncholytic, mucolytic, and antibacterial therapy than in patients without concomitant pathology. Treatment and a complex of rehabilitation measures, normalization of respiratory function, compensation for concomitant bronchopulmonary pathology was possible to be achieves as a result of the diagnosis of concomitant bronchopulmonary pathology. Careful diagnostic search and optimal treatment of all somatic pathology are important factors in the selection of adequate therapy for elderly patients suffering from coronavirus infection with comorbid pulmonary pathology. All rights reserved © Eco-Vector, 2022.

DERMATO-NEURO SYNDROME PRECIPITATED BY COVID-19 INFECTION IN THE SETTING OF SCLEROMYXEDEMA

BackgroundA black female in her 40s presented with a nonpruritic rash for 10 months consisting of bumps on the face, hands, forearms, and thighs. She had no prior treatment. Past medical history was significant for pulmonary embolism (PE) 6 years prior. She had no personal or family history of autoimmune disease. Physical exam revealed numerous smooth 2-3 mm skin-colored papules over the bilateral forearm dorsa, hands, anterior thighs, and face. Serum protein electrophoresis revealed monoclonal IgG lambda gammopathy. Skin biopsy of her left elbow showed dermal fibroplasia with mucin deposition. IgG was less than 1.5 grams/deciliter;bloodwork was otherwise stable. The diagnosis of scleromyxedema was rendered.ObjectivesThe objective of this clinical case was to evaluate a neurologic sequela of COVID-19 infection in a patient with scleromyxedema.MethodsOne month following diagnosis of scleromyxedema, our patient was diagnosed with COVID-19 five days before admission to the emergency department with altered mental status and aphasia. Rheumatology was consulted due to malignant hypertension and acute kidney injury with question of scleroderma-like renal crisis in the setting of recently diagnosed COVID-19 infection, although she had no other features of systemic sclerosis. The infectious disease team was consulted due to COVID-19-induced inflammatory reaction.ResultsThe patient's creatinine kinase and brain natriuretic peptide were elevated. Creatinine and potassium trended upwards. She developed seizures and became hemodynamically unstable with rapidly declining clinical status. She was transferred to the intensive care unit, where she developed respiratory arrest, shock, hyperkalemia, and acidemia. She received escalating doses of pressors but experienced frequent arrhythmic disturbances and developed asystole. Resuscitation efforts were unsuccessful;she expired within 24 hours of consultation.ConclusionDermato-neuro syndrome (DNS) is a potential complication of scleromyxedema associated with confusion, dysarthria, seizures, and coma. The patient's clinical presentation is consistent with DNS in the setting of scleromyxedema likely precipitated by COVID-19. Intravenous immunoglobulins are first-line treatment for scleromyxedema;however, it is associated with risk of venous thromboembolism. The patient was considered for treatment as an outpatient but deferred due to history of PE. She was reevaluated for treatment upon presentation to the hospital, but given the severity and rapidity of her condition, it was already too late. This is the second reported case of COVID-19 induced DNS in a patient with scleromyxedema. Given the severity, we recommend early initiation of treatment in patients with scleromyxedema and aggressive treatment for those contracting COVID-19.References[1] Haber R, Bachour J, El Gemayel M. Scleromyxedema treatment: a systematic review and update. Int J Dermatol. 2020;59:1191-1201.[2] Flannery MT, Humphrey D. Deep Venous Thrombosis with Pulmonary Embolism Related to IVIg Treatment: A Case Report and Literature Review. Case Rep Med. 2015;971321.[3] Lee YH, Sahu J, O'Brien MS, D'Agati VD, Jimenez SA. Scleroderma Renal Crisis-Like Acute Renal Failure Associated With Mucopolysaccharide Accumulation in Renal Vessels in a Patient With Scleromyxedema. J Clin Rheumatol. 2011;17:318-322.[4] Hoffman-Vold AM, Distler O, Bruni C, et al. Systemic sclerosis in the time of COVID-19. Lancet Rheumatol. 2022;4:e566-575.[5] Fritz M, Tinker D, Wessel AW, et al. SARS-CoV-2: A potential trigger of dermato-neuro syndrome in a patient with scleromyxedema. JAAD Case Rep. 2021;18:99-102.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

Association between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Covid-19 Severity: A Literature Review

We conducted a review and evaluated the already documents reports for the relationship among diabetes and COVID-19. The review outcome shows that the COVID-19 severity seems to be greater among patients with diabetes as comorbidity. So, strict glycemic control is imperative in patients infected with COVID-19. Thus, world-wide diabetes burden and COVID-19 pandemic must be deliberated as diabetes increases the COVID-19 severity. Established on this, it is precise significant to follow specific treatment protocols and clinical management in COVID-19 patients affected with diabetes to prevent morbidity and mortality.Copyright © 2023 The Authors.

ST-SEGMENT-ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION in COVID-19

Introduction: The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 have been associated with cardiovascular adverse events including acute myocardial infarction due to a prothrombotic and hypercoagulable status, and endothelial dysfunction. Case report: We report the case of a 62-year-old women, admitted to the hospital via the emergency room for acute chest pain and dyspnea. A nasopharyngeal swab was positive for COVID19 real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction 11 day ago. On admission, she was hypotensive with systolic blood pressure measering 87 mmHg and tachycardic with 117 beats/min, oxygen saturation (SO2) was 94%. An 18-lead ECG revealed an infero-postero-lateral ST-elevation myocardial infarction with right ventricular involvement and a seconddegree- Mobitz Type 1 atrioventricular block. The coronary angiography from the right femoral artery showed acute thrombotic occlusion of the first diagonal branch with TIMI 0 flow and acute thrombotic occlusion of proximal right coronary artery with TIMI 0 flow. The most likely diagnosis was myocardial infarction secondary to a non-atherosclerotic coronary occlusion. The angioplasy was performed with dilatations with a semi compliant balloon, bailout implant of BMS, manual thrombus aspiration and intracoronary injection of tirofiban in the right coronary artery. The myocardial revascularization was ineffective. The patient developed significant severe hemodynamic instability and cardiac arrest for pulseless electric activity after 24 hours. Conclusion(s): The COVID-19 outbreak implies deep changes in the clinical profile and therapeutic management of STEMI patients who underwent PCI. At present, the natural history of coronary embolism is not well understood;however, the cardiac mortality rate are hight. This suggests these patients require further study to identify the natural history of the condition and to optimize management to improve outcome.

The use of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in COVID-19: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes

Objectives: The objective of this study is to assess the clinical benefits and potential risks of using venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) as a treatment for COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. Method(s): Relevant studies were identified through searches of electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, from January 2020 to December 2022. We included observational studies on adult patients who received venovenous (VV) ECMO support for COVID-19-induced ARDS. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, 3-month mortality, and complications associated with VV ECMO. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.0.3 and the metafor and meta packages. Result(s): The final analysis included 39 studies comprising 10,702 patients. In-hospital mortality for adults receiving ECMO was 34.2% (95% CI: 28.5% - 40.3%;I2 = 93%), while the 3-month mortality rate was 50.2% (95% CI: 44.4% - 56.0%;I2 = 51%). Bleeding requiring transfusion occurred in 33.7% of patients (95% CI, 23.9 - 45.1;I2 = 96%). The pooled estimates for other complications were as follows: overall thromboembolic events 40.9% (95% CI, 24.8 - 59.3;I2 = 97%), stroke 8.7% (95% CI, 5.7 - 13.2;I2 = 72%), deep vein thrombosis 15.4% (95% CI, 9.7 - 23.6;I2 = 80%), pulmonary embolism 15.6% (95% CI, 9.3 - 25.1;I2 = 92%), gastrointestinal haemorrhage 8.1% (95% CI, 5.5 - 11.8;I2 = 56%), and the need for any renal replacement therapy in 38.0% of patients (95% CI, 31.6 - 44.8;I2 = 84%). Bacterial pneumonia occurred in 46.4% of patients (95% CI, 32.5 - 61.0;I2 = 96%). Conclusion(s): Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) may be an effective treatment option for COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. The use of VV ECMO was associated with reduced in-hospital and 3-month mortality. However, bleeding is a common complication that should be closely monitored. Further research is needed to determine the optimal use of VV ECMO in this patient population and to identify factors that may predict a favourable response to treatment.

HIGH DOSE INTRAVENOUS ANAKINRA TREATMENT IS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE IN SEVERE AND CRITICAL COVID-19 PATIENTS: A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED STUDY IN A SINGLE CENTER

BackgroundIn COVID-19 severe disease course such as need of intensive care unit (ICU) as well as development of mortality is mainly due to cytokine storm.ObjectivesIn this study, we aimed to evaluate the high dose intravenous anakinra treatment response and outcome in patients with severe and critical COVID-19 compared to standard of care.MethodsThis retrospective observational study was carried out at a tertiary referral center. The study population consisted of two groups as follows;the patients receiving high dose intravenous anakinra (anakinra group) between 01.09.2021 and 01.02.2022 and the patients treated with standard of care (SoC, control group) as historical control group who were hospitalized between 01.07.2021 and 01.09.2021.ResultsAfter the propensity score 1:1 matching 79 patients in anakinra and 79 patients in SoC matched and included into the analysis. Mean±SD patient age was 67.4±16.7 and 67.1±16.3 years in anakinra and SoC group, respectively (p=0.9). Male gender was 38 (48.7 %) in anakinra and 36 (46.2 %) SoC (p=0.8). Overall, ICU admission was in 14.1 % (n=11) and 30.8 % (n=24) (p=0.013;OR: 6.2), intubation in 12.8 % (n=10) and 16.7 % (n=13) patients (p=0.5), 14.1 % (n=11) and 32.1 % (n=25) patients died in anakinra and control group, respectively (p=0.008;OR: 7.1)ConclusionIn our study mortality was lower in patients receiving anakinra compared to SoC. Intravenous high dose anakinra is safe and effective treatment in patients with severe and critical COVID-19.Table 1.Baseline clinical and laboratory features of patients receiving standard of care (SoC) and Anakinra before and after propensity score (PS) matchingBefore PS matchingAfter PS matchingVariablesAnakinra (n=148)SoC (n=114)p value (OR)Anakinra (n=78)SoC (n=78)p value (OR)Age (years) (mean±SD)66.8±1763.1±170.0967.4±16.767.1±16.30.9Gender, male (n, %)78 (52.7)45 (39.5)0.033 (4.5)38 (48.7)36 (46.2)0.8Duration of hospitalization (days) (median, IQR)11 (12)9 (7.3)0.027.5 (9)11 (8)0.01Comorbidities (n, %) Diabetes mellitus41/146 (28.1)39 (34.2)0.318 (23)31 (39.7)0.025 (5) Hypertension84/143 (58.7)64 (56)0.730 (61.5)50 (64)0.7 Coronary heart disease27/143 (19)24 (21)0.718 (23)20 (25.6)0.7 Heart failure18/143 (12.6)23 (20)0.114 (18)20 (25.6)0.24 Chronic renal failure31 (21)6 (5.3)<0.001 (13.06)15 (19)6 (7.7)0.035 (4.5) Chronic obstructive lung disease23/144 (16)19 (16.7)0.914 (18)15 (19)0.8 Dementia15/117 (12.8)2 (1.8)0.001 (10.4)3/61 (5)2 (2.6)0.5 Malignancy16/146 (11)8 (7)0.39 (11.5)6 (7.7)0.4 Immunosuppressive usage18/146 (12.3)2 (1.8)0.001 (10.08)5 (6.5)2 (2.6)0.2Disease severity (n, %) NIH score 3 (severe)57 (38.5)68 (59.6)0.001 (11.5)48 (61.5)44 (56.4)0.5 NIH score 4 (critical)91 (61.5)46 (40.4)30 (38.5)34 (43.6) mcHIS score (mean±SD)3.4±1.22.64±1.5<0.0012.9±13.1±1.30.2PS: Propensity score, SoC: Standard of care, OR: Odds ratio, SD: Standard deviation, IQR: Interquartile range, mcHIS: Modified Covid hyperinflammatory syndrome score, NIH: National Institute Health, ALT: Alanin aminotransferase, AST: Aspartate aminotransferaseTable 2.Outcomes of patients receiving SoC and Anakinra before and after PS matchingBefore PS matchingAfter PS matchingVariables (n, %)Anakinra (n=148)SoC (n=114)p value (OR)Anakinra (n=78)SoC (n=78)p value (OR)Pneumothorax3/134 (2.2)00.25*2/73 (2.7)00.5*Myocardial infarction3/132 (2.3)6 (5.3)0.32/72 (2.8)2/56 (3.6)1Pulmonary embolism4/134 (3)11 (9.6)0.034 (4.8)*3/73 (4.1)7 (9)0.3*Intensive care unit60 (40.5)25 (22)0.001 (10.2)11 (14.1)24 (30.8)0.013 (6.2)Intubation54 (36.5)13 (11.4)<0.001 (21.3)10 (12.8)13 (16.7)0.5Mortality56 (37.8)27 (23.7)0.015 (5.96)11 (14.1)25 (32.1)0.008 (7.1)PS: Propensity score, SoC: Standard of care, OR: Odds ratioREFERENCES:NIL.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

EXPERIENCE WITH TIXAGEVIMAB AND CILGAVIMAB (EVUSHELD) IN 86 RHEUMATIC PATIENTS UNDERGOING ANTI-B CELL THERAPY WITH RITUXIMAB.

The problem of prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IMRD) remains highly relevant. The presence of IRD is associated with a high risk of disease and severe course of COVID-19 during immunosuppressive treatment, primarily anti-B cell therapy with rituximab (RTX), and a low level of post-vaccination response in such patients. A new strategy for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 are virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies to coronavirus;currently, combined long-acting monoclonal antibodies tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld) are registered for prevention in the world and the Russian Federation. . Tixagevimab and cilgavimab (TC) show neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2, including the Omicron strain, primarily its variants BA.4, BA.5, BA.2.75 ("Centaur"). Objective - to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TC for pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19 in rheumatic patients receiving RTX, based on a prospective observational study. Materials and methods. The main group included 86 patients with various IMRD receiving RTX: 50 of them had ANCA-associated systemic vasculitis (AAV), 15 - rheumatoid arthritis, 9 - Sjogren's syndrome (SS), 4 - IgG4-related disease, 3 - systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 3 - dermatomyositis (DM), 2 - systemic scleroderma (SSD). Median age was 59 (19-82) years;male: female ratio - 1:1,8. From March 26 to August 30 2022, patients received a single intramuscular injection of TC in a total dose of 300 mg, mainly after RTX (in 52% of cases, in 28% on the next day after RTX). The control group included 42 patients with AAV (median age - 45 (35-71) years;male: female ratio - 1:1), also treated with RTX, who did not receive pre-exposure prophylaxis of TC. The duration of observation was 7 months, until November 1 2022. At this time, 98% of confirmed cases of coronavirus in the Russian Federation were Omicron. A telephone and/or online survey of patient has been conducted to detect cases of COVID-19 and adverse reactions. Results. In the TC group, confirmed coronavirus infection have been detected in 17 (20%) patients (AAV - 10, SS - 3, SSD - 2, SLE - 1, DM - 1), with fever in 7 (8%), only in one case hospitalization was required (lung damage was not detected in computed tomography), in two cases, according to CT mild lung damage (CT 1-2), there were no deaths. Good TC's tolerability was noted, signs not associated with COVID-19 or progression of IMRD after administration of TC were observed in 8 (9%) patients (GPA - 3 MPA - 1, RA - 2, SLE - 1, IgG4-related disease - 1), adverse reactions definitely associated with the use of TC were not found. The most serious event not associated with coronavirus infection was the progression of polyneuropathy in a patient with RA. In the control group, 3 (7%) patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, one with severe lung injury (CT 3, pulmonary embolism) and death. Conclusions. The data of clinical studies and our own clinical experience evidence the effectiveness of the use of a combination of long-acting monoclonal antibodies TC (Evusheld), registered for indications for pre-exposure prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19. Patients with IMRD treated with RTX have a favorable safety profile of TC. The introduction of virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, a new drug class for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases, opens significant prospects for improving the prognosis of patients with IRD.Copyright © 2023 Ima-Press Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Intensive Care Society State of the Art (SOA) 2022 Abstracts

The proceedings contain 117 papers. The topics discussed include: informing local policy through an audit of the assessment, management and outcomes of intermediate and high-risk patients with pulmonary embolism;an initial exploration into the use of a novel virtual reality system to aid rehabilitation in intensive care;surprising chest radiograph- air in mediastinum;exploring tissue donation as part of end-of-life wishes- a duty of care following death on ICU?;the impact of deprivation on respiratory support unit outcomes in COVID-19 patients, and highlights from wave 2 data in Portsmouth;survey of attitudes towards end of life care as a tool in identifying areas for improvement;a quality improvement project regarding family communication within critical care;sleep promotion in a busy inner city high dependency unit;findings from a regional survey of critical care nursing staff focusing on retention and factors that influence wellbeing;and tracking functional recovery post critical illness.